I seriously doubt the validity of such claims at this point in time. If there were things to find, they would have found them already. I think your first response was the most accurate, a political election. Pay particular attention this fall as I am certain the threat level will be elevated once again in the sept-oct months. Los
How about a request section on the forums?
Here is mine. Opulance Wall: Lucy Liu Samurize
Here come the black helicopters again.
"A lot of liberals are convinced that this war would be so much better if the French and the Germans were involved, but the thing they forget to mention is that Bush already headed down that path." The French were never going to go along with removing Saddam. The "oil for food" scam will show how keeping Saddam in power was in the best interest for France. Everytime Kerry or another democrat talks about the "international community", they me
There is no reason to concede he was wrong for going into Iraq. He made the right decision. Everytime I hear somebody talk about the U.N. I just have to laugh. The U.N. is caught in possibly one of the biggest scandals and scams in the world. The U.S. went to the U.N. to resolve this problem, like so many other times, they failed. If it was up to the U.N, the french, and the germans, Saddam would still be in power today. And we are rapi
I think he's just reading quotes from Ted Kennedy.
Nazul, why don't you send that to the families of the people on those planes and in the buildings that were attacked. Your conspiracy theories are jutst stupid.
The U.N. is a corupt organization. It will be great to see who in the U.N. was being bribed by Saddam. The U.N. never wanted Saddam out of power anyway, so do you think they really care if Iraq becomes stable? " Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry complains that President Bush pursued a unilateralist foreign policy that gave short shrift to the concerns of the United Nations and our allies when it came to taking military action agai
"The so-called "terrorists" are NOT the real threat to America – they never have been! Many excellent books, such as Order Out of Chaos and 9/11 – Descent Into Tyranny, have been written and they clearly show that governments themselves often commit terrorist acts and then blame them on others in order to implement their own political agenda." Islamic terrorists are the threat to America. There was no conspiracy on Sept. 11. Get over it. </
"Few years ago the US seemed to be the best place to begin a new life, right now people are no so sure. Are you living in a demcratic country?" Who are these people? Why don't you go try living in Saudi Arabia or Iran. Maybe those "people" will like it.
"Bush was beaten last election wasn't he (tongue in cheek)" Bush won the election. Get over it.
Palestinians have been offered their own state before, and the number two terrorist in the world, Arafat, rejected it. Palestinians don't want peace, they want Israel to be destroyed.
A game is the only way that Kerry can beat Bush.
Sorry I got my quotes confused. Now to clarify my posts. I wasn't making an insult at you. I associate palestinians with terrorism. That was the point of the pro-terrorist, pro-palestinian remark. It was not directed at you.
"Again, it's NOT a conspiracy, it's not a secret. How many times do I have to write that before you stop accusing me of being a conspiracy theorist? The PNAC pushed for armed action against Iraq since 1997. Several of their founder members went on to become members of the Bush administration. The people who pushed hardest for the invasion of Iraq - Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld - were PNAC members." They pushed for action in Iraq because Clinton and
"Look it's not a conspiracy at all - it's not a secret. The Project for a New American Century is not a secret organisation" A conservative think tank? I assume you are referring to the letter sent to Clinton that conspiracy theorists like to say "was the plan" to invade Iraq. It's almost funny when I type in pnac in google and ufo sites pop up. Left wing credibility at work . Here is an excerpt of the letter that conspiracy theori
" Island, it's obvious from current events that Iraq is not exactly a state friendly to America in the Middle East." It was estimated there are about 1000 terrorists involved in the recent "events". How does that represent the millions of people in Iraq? It doesn't. The terrorists and insurgents are a very small part of the population, they in no way represent Iraq as a whole.
"The neo-cons planned this invasion long before 9-11, long before they even came back to power. This is no secret. They wanted to install a pro-US, pro-Israel state in the heart of the Middle East. They wanted to control its oil supply. 9-11 was a convenient way to frogmarch Americans into supporting these imperialist ambitions. " Actually the Clinton administration made it offical U.S. policy for regime change in Iraq. The only problem with
As HIillary Clinton and Howard Dean say, "the world is not any safer wtih saddam gone". Yeah right. http://phoenix158.org/iraq/images/Saddam%20and%20WTC.JPG
"What do you think the cost would be if Libya smuggles a nuclear bomb into New York Harbor in 2010? Should we invade Libya? Why or why not? What do you think the cost would be if Iran smuggles a nuclear bomb into New York Harbor in 2010? Should we invade Iran? Why or why not?" LIbya has given up it's WMD's and allowed for the U.S. to inspect his weapons programs. That was in direct response to the action taken in Iraq. Iran is
"One (of many) Presidential Daily (Intelligence) Briefs (PDBs), dated August 6th 2001, and a frequent theme in Rice's Q&A -- titled “Bin Laden Determined to Strike Inside US” -- is only the barest tip of a criminal iceberg. Rice's position that it was a speculative paper was beneath disingenuous and belied by the title itself. The commission's intense focus on that PDB alone, to the exclusion of many other more damning unclassified and available record
"Why DO some people compare large military maneuvers such as this version of the Gulf War to Vietnam, I wonder? Perhaps it is because it is an unpopular war, perhaps it is because there was no exit strategy proposed when the idea to invade was wrought. Maybe it is due to the fact that the people we are trying to help are shooting us in the back. Maybe it is because Americans are losing lives without any tangible goal being achieved. Nobody will admit t
"On no less than seven different occasions in today's long-awaited testimony before the September 11th Commission, National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice insisted that there was no specific advance knowledge as to the time, place and method of the attacks, and that there was no warning of a domestic internal threat from Al Qaeda throughout the spring and summer of 2001. With these sworn statements the biggest vulnerability of the Bush administratio
Very good post. The problem is we have people in this country, mainly on the left, who don't see the threat of terrorism. Just look at John Kerry who says "terrorism is exaggerated".
JoeUser Forums
WinCustomize Forums