Skirantra
Effective nerf?
I wouldn't swear to these conclusions for the moment, that's why I'm throwing this out there to hear what others say. But unless I hear something that changes my mind, it seems to be correct.
I've been trying to use the skirantra to counter various things by advent and tec. It has dawned upon me that while it received a buff along with the other carrier caps, its buff is far less useful in practice, so it received an effective nerf against the other carrier caps.
The ability that got buffed was the scramble bombers ability. Contrast that with the sova missle platform buff and heavy strikecraft buff, and the halcyon adept drone animae buff. The problem is, the ability that got buffed for vasari is an antimatter using ability that is in competition with another antimatter using ability (repair) that you'd almost always rather be using most of the time.
- The sova gets buffed missle platform and buffed heavy strikecraft. The former is the antimatter-using ability it would rather be using in combat anyway, the latter doesn't use antimatter.
- The halcyon gets buffed adept drone animae. It is not an antimatter using ability.
- The skirantra gets buffed scramble bombers, an antimatter using ability that is direct competition with another vital antimatter using ability - repair.
In practice, you end up using repair in combat, but repair wasn't buffed! So it's like you are playing with a capship that wasn't buffed like the others were. I'm not saying scramble bombers doesn't have its uses, I'm just saying you are forced to choose which antimatter using ability you are gonna use for the battle you are in, and if you choose repair you aren't getting the buff. If you choose buffed scramble bombers, you aren't getting repair. Neither tec nor advent have to make this choice - the special abilities on their caps fit well together and don't compete with each other.
What needs to happen is, scramble bombers needs to be made a passive ability, and then tuned to the fact that it is passive.
What say you?