[quote who="Elestan" reply="614" id="3712033"] Quoting wibblenz, reply 611 Personally I am confused as to how "Spathi" can be a trademark at all right now - there is no product called "Spathi" being sold or distributed - there is only copyright, protecting the depiction of the Spathi as they appear in the existing games, but not
[quote who="Elestan" reply="611" id="3712024"] Quoting wibblenz, reply 610 I agree - assuming the UQM project is not also the rights owner. So, this is where another question creeps in: Let's assume that at the moment that the last SC3 sale was made (around 1999?), Accolade did have a common-l
[quote who="Frogboy" reply="602" id="3711959"] Quoting wibblenz, reply 598 There is precedence for free distribution via the internet to constitute "transport in commerce, resulting in the creation of trademark rights and priority" : https://caselaw.fi