Many in this lovely country of ours have already figured out that these taps are illegal, guys.
AsWayOpens
Well, no, actually. I would very much love for everyone to get more involved in their government. We have more power than we realize. And contacting your rep[resentatives to let them know how you feel about such important things is sure one way to be involved. My feelings on it are to not trust this particular government to make the decision about pre-emptive strikes. W
Tom Harkin: Why I Fully Support Bush Censure We have a President who likes to break things. He has broken the federal budget, running up $3 trillion in new debt. He has broken the Geneva Conventions, giving the green light to torture. He has repeatedly broken promises – and broken faith – with the American people. And now, worst of all, he has broken the law. In brazen violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), he
He did not run away. He continuously fights the battle and does run from his conscience. More are signing on and talking about it as we speak.
Shall, "we the people" let them know how we feel about this? Contact your representatives to let then know how you feel about any more pre-emptive strikes! Link
Getting ready for the protests that will be marking the third anniversary of the Iraq war, and as Senators are calling for the censure of Bush, Freedom of Information requests have shown several groups to have been spied on. Imagine, one group was passing out flyers promoting pacifism!! The damn nerve of 'em. Michigan Peaceworks will be sending mugshots
Senators Harkin, Boxer and Chafee are coming on board and others are saying it is worth discussion.
I accept your apology for calling me lazy. Two more Senators have joined the call for censure!!
My blog in the forums.... Sen. Feingold's Bill to Censure Bush! By: AsWayOpens Posted: 3/13/2006 12:38:41 PM on JoeUser.com Once he makes it to the floor to introduce it, call or write your representatives to back it! Nobody should be above the law and this is the very least we can do. The comments
You seem to be missing a very valid point here. "No one" and I do mean no one has come forth and shown that what GW did was illegal. Then why do they find it necessary to change the law?
Thank you for the link BTW. A very interesting resolution. I am however curious about what some have said here. If Bush did break the law then why is he not facing a court or charges, instead Sen. Feingold makes a resolution to get him in trouble anyways. This to me sounds morer like Bush needs to get into trouble one way or the
Well, I guess it has been decided then. Lazy, I am not. Limited on time, I am. I also assume that others have the ability to read and see what I do, to look up issues brought up. I mean, are you all just going to go on the writer's blog or are you going to look into it for yourselfs? I've written a few brief things that have brought about discussions, other than my blogging style. Now, may I ask how I put this on my blog page?
Link This will take you to the Bill.
Thanks, Shades. Sen. Feingold is getting a lot of online support, but not a lot of public support. It's just amazing to watch sometimes, isn't it? Many Senators questioning the legality of the wire tapping, but only wanting to change laws to support it, instead of acting on the fact the law was broken. The fact that they feel they need to change the law should prove it was broken to begin with.
Once he makes it to the floor to introduce it, call or write your representatives to back it! Nobody should be above the law and this is the very least we can do.
loons often discuss rumours, eh?
Very true. Someone I know thinks they would replace him with McCain.
Has anyone else heard it, in a serious way? I first heard it mentioned by Chris Matthews, who insists he will leave. Then I saw it reported on The Drudge Report, Link and Insight Link <!--
I'm not sure I get the commenting part here, showing up sometimes on some pages, but not on others.
No, I don't think it's fair for them to threaten econmic blackmail against us. I don't think America likes to be threatened. I also insist that the problem with the ports deal is no different than Bush saying we can help India with nuclear stuff, but not Pakistan. If we are allowed to look at the history of a country when deciding things about our security, why we can't we do the same with the ports deal?
OK, but you saw the link...right?
I'm not sure where my comment went to. But I commented saying, I took no offense. Sometimes I get to watch the votes while they are happening. I know I should link more and I just posted a blog with a link.
What a way to show your true colors! Threaten us. This is for you, BakerStreet.... Link
OK, I will look for links.