joetheblow joetheblow

What do you think about Nuclear Weapons?

What do you think about Nuclear Weapons?


I think they are passé. There is no reason to develop better ones or for that matter make more of them.

I can think of one reason to make better ones and that is to blow up asteroids or meteors that threaten the Earth with impact.


A nuclear bomb is not going to scare a terrorist because terrorist use different tactics and use the community as their shield/catalyst.

So is there any reason why someone would approve new better nuclear bombs?


http://slate.msn.com/id/2091531/





46,851 views 97 replies
Reply #51 Top
Probably because I live in a town where we produce titanium. One of the only plants left.


and that makes us a target because we make parts for the space shuttle, tanks, firearms, ect.
Reply #52 Top
well if your town is lucky, the jobs doing that won't end up in China for the most part..

Reply #53 Top
well if your town is lucky, the jobs doing that won't end up in China for the most part..


we get our ore from overseas, and 1 plant has already been shut down due to mergers. But I doubt they will move all production overseas.
Reply #54 Top
Long before any weaponry can take us out, resistant bacteria will have done so. Thanks to the gratious abuse of antibiotics.

By the way, Kona, don't you mean uranium instead of titanium?
Reply #55 Top
no. I mean titanium. My uncle works there.
Reply #56 Top
not really. man has done more to harm this planet then any other form of life. things like pullution, cloning, cutting down rain forests, genetic research, mutatations... all of that man has done or is doing and the planet is suffering.


Regardless of wether its ethical or not, how does cloning harm the planet? Why not clone some more trees for that deforestation problem?

I would also like to bring to your attention that genetic research not only feeds much of the planet but it also provides solutions to pullution. Very much of the food you eat on a day to day basis is a GMO or genetically modified organism. While many people preach the supposed side effects of these GMOS they forget that without these price of food would be a lot more than what you see now today. Genetics also helps clean up oil fields by using genetically modified bacteria to decompose the oil. There is also research being done to creating organisms that will help decompose garbage more quickly.

Also, mutation is a very natural part of life. It's how organisms adapt to their surroundings over great periods of time. Mutations are what cause some certain people to be immune to life threatening diseases such as HIV. But its a double-edged sword. Mutation is also what causes cancer and its also what allows disease causing bacteria and viri to evolve and become resistant to treatment. The statement that man is accountable for natural things like mutation is just not valid considering. And considering all the resources out there about these topics, it really disheartens me to read such ill-educated remarks.
Reply #57 Top
the precession and nutation of the earth's polar axis as it rotates varies the weather more than greenhouse gases. ( look at the magnitude of the "P & N" corrections in celestial navigation star tables if you doubt). when the earth has had enough of us, it will remove us like a dog shaking the water out of its fur, and it will be quite a lively show!

nukes are neither good nor evil. the human race is decidedly evil. perhaps we should mix the two with great caution.
Reply #58 Top
Oooh, that's pretty interesting stuff you brought up. But I'm in agreement with you, when the planet has had enough, be ready...hehe. Mother nature will only put up with so much before she |3i7C|-| slaps us all out of existence. But then we're getting into apocalyptic type stuff. And I could only imagine what some of the pretentious people around would have to say about that.
Reply #59 Top
I guess the planet deciding to reverse magnetic poles would be rather interesting.
Axil change would also be a shocker to see take place.

But then again, there are a number of nature driven possibilities for total destruction of live as we know it.

Heck the whole of the US East Coast line could be changed dramatically with a single suitcase nuke placed in a fault that runs along a semi-dormant Volcanic Island right off the African Coast. It would cause almost a third of the Island to slid into the Sea which would cause a Tsunomi(spelling) something like 600 to 700 feet tall moving over 600 mph to head to the West. When it hit the Americas it would reach as far north as New York and as far south as mid South America. They claim it would travel up to 100 miles in land in lower areas and totally change the coast line.

neat huh?

Boy gotta love them nukes combine with the power of nature...

Yeah humans are the only thing evil on this planet, kind of kizmit though considering we created the whole concept and all...
Reply #60 Top
"tsunami"
Reply #61 Top
So when can we detonate?
Reply #65 Top
Yeah....just saw that, Crae...
Reply #66 Top
Regardless of wether its ethical or not, how does cloning harm the planet?


What you talkin' about Chi Chi?


Unless you mean the rock called Earth and not refering to any of the life forms on it.


We have no real idea as to how the clones will effect the food chain, cycle of life, or any number of issues.
[Message Edited]
[Message Edited]
Reply #67 Top
Hey IPlural, wouldn't the wall of water crest crash about 10 miles inland to California (where WinCusto's Servers are at)?

Also wouldn't it have to pass the mountain range before it got that far East (like New York) even at 600 miles per hour?

I think we will feel the wind that would come from such a action though, but the water I am not to sure. Plus, isn't there another mountain range before you get to New York? Wouldn't the Mississippi river absorb allot of what would pass the mountain range on the west coast (what is left of it)?




I always found the idea of a water wave amazing. A meteor hitting the Ocean sending a wave of water... that is why I wanted to move toward inland. Pennsylvania or something. Oregon is to far West. Michigan? Illinois?
Reply #68 Top
na, West Coast of Africa, East Coast of US.... = heading West across the Atlantic...

It was on Discovery about 2 months after 9/11. Kinda threw me seeing it, nothing like advertising

[Message Edited]
Reply #69 Top
Cloning is like photocopying a life form. An exact copy wont effect the food chain. We can use cloning for such things as preserving life by sustaining certain species on the planet and keeping the food chain in correct balance. I would say that we should try and stop killing off species, but we can't go back in time and fix past mistakes like endangering a species very easily.

I think youre more thinking along the lines of how does genetics affect the balance of things. Yes, we rushed into genetics and caused some problems. If anyone is familiar with this type of science, one notable instance of a mistake was BT corn. A genetically modified type of corn engineered to resist insects. Not only did it resist them, but tests showed that the milkweed leaves (the primary diet of monarch caterpillars) that were heavely dusted with BT corn pollen became sick. The scientists who did this study assumed that because of this, BT corn was a risk to monarch butterflies. This is the type of effect I think you're referring to. Tests later done by the USDA proved that BT presented little to no risk towards monarchs.

But genetics is growing by leaps and bounds and geneticists are much more careful about the possible side effects of genetically engineered organisms on other life on the planet.

Somewhere around 70% of the worlds crops are GMO's. Btw.

edit: The caterpillars got sick, not the milkweed.... My fingers are really slow and my brain works too fast for them.....sometimes
[Message Edited]
Reply #70 Top
whats next? nano technolgy? nona technology scares me as well.
Reply #71 Top
Innovation scares a lot of people...I'd encourage you to research the things that scare you. Understanding your fears is a good first step to overcoming them.
Reply #72 Top
Hey i am not that scared that I would shake in my boots. I am very aware of my fears.

Death however, I am not afrad of.
Reply #74 Top
my point is I have already overcome my fears. I am no wuss. Sure nuclear war scares me but there is nothing I can do about it so why worry about it?
Reply #75 Top
bit presumptious don't you think?
assuming to know of others fears and what not?

I damn well do not need to have someone else explain them to me or how to face them.
Though I probably could use a rest from them and have someone else deal with them for
a while, but then again this sin't the place for such...

nore is it therapy 101