This is the first time I have seen someone question the idea of disabling virtual memory when one's computer has at least 16 gB memory. Not understanding the windows process, I would venture to say that logically why wouldn't you add a swap file in that case...just in the (perhaps extremely rare, to be sure) instance that Windows calls more more memory than 16 gB, as a falll back. I mean, if as is assumed by those who suggest turning VM off that memory past 16 gB is not going to be accessed, then how is there a performance hit if the swap file is never used?
But I suppose I am just betraying my lack of understanding of the Windows Monster. Sheesh, I remember the 6508 processor. I actually understood how that worked. But then computers moved on and I gave up, it wasn't any fun any more.
Thanks for the heads up I will investigate this a bit more.
[EDIT] There is a long article on this subject here:
http://tweakhound.com/2011/10/10/the-windows-7-pagefile-and-running-without-one/
I was directed to it from an article in How-To Geek. It appears to completely agree with kyro! Performance gains from disabling the page file, under extensive testing, are indicated to be a myth.
Well, I learn something new every day!