Issue is that A BUNCH of people are on the internets. As in, possible way too many. Many of whom are perverts. Or furries. Or both.
End of quote
so could you please educate us as to whom is not worth to be on the internet? who are these "way to many" that shoulc be removed?
while your at it could you also define what a pervert is? someone who thinks it's ok ot have more than one wife at a time? would that be considered a pervert? If so there goes moat of the state of Utha and all of Islam.
Is someone who has sex outside of marrage a pervert?
Is someone who thinks having sex in other than the missionary position a pervert?
Whos standards shall we use to deside who are these "too many people" who are cluttering up your beloved internet?
Perhaps if we were to restrict access to say anyone under the age of 21 be a good idea? It would after all eliminate the vast majority of people who know nothing but think they know it all... Or perhaps we should restrict access to those over 25 who might know somethings that challage the thoughts of those under 21, forcing them to think before they make uninformed remarks?
@rhelamos, I am sure that you did not mean to say anything like what would apply to my sarcastic responce above, but do you see from this example how the written word could be more alkward than a verbal conversation? perhapps, if you are, as you state, passionate about your work in education, you might want to consider investing in a public speaking cource.... I did a long time ago and it paid off very very well..
btw what the heck is a furries?