... 

What is the point of asking the same question that they keep answering all over the forums? You realize that they aren't even to the 'in-house' alpha level yet right?

'Immediate' ... not threatening language at all. 

Your win7 uses 2 gigs?

Wow, mine (Win7 64 bit) uses barely over a gig.

Well, wouldn't be the first time Wikipedia was wrong in some way. I can get Win7 down to 800 Mbs when I set it to my gaming settings. Nacey got his down to 500. 1 gig to 1.2 is what I normally see on most systems.

I'm using chrome and I'm fine.

Well, in these case, Wikipedia have similar value that these of Microsoft :

http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows7/products/system-requirements

As for the physical memory limit and processor limit, look at :

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366778%28v=vs.85%29.aspx

Interesting to see at the same link that only desktop 32 bit OS are limited to 4gb or less... non desktop 32 bit version can reach a max of 64 gb...

As your 800 mb win7 x64, it is like my 300 mb xp pro x64... we both know our system and how to tune it... hey, i have directx 10 on XP , what was say to not be possible by microsoft... Problem is that the usual JoeUser don't know enough about computer and his not able to tune it...

in fact, with XP, the basic configuration in case of 4 gb is 2 gb application and 2 gb OS... same if the OS don't use the 2gb, it is reserved... at the previous link, down the page, click the "4-Gigabyte tuning" link and it explain how to increase the memory who can be used for application from 2gb to 3gb... How much from the Joeuser know about it?

Pretty sure that win7 x64 is great in some way... but putting a F1 driver ( win7 ) in a FordT ( computer with only 4gb ram or less ) don't make the car ride over 250 km/h !!!

About time, 4 years and the same site design

It seems to happen in various browsers. My android phone and firefox install does the same thing as that pic above. It works ok in Chrome and IE 8 on my machine. 

I'm also unable to post karma in anything but Chrome, except it looks like this 

Likewise, except there was also one point where everything on the screen shifted all the way over to the left and the Sins background didn't show up, but that was 2-3 days ago and it hasn't happened since.

Also, I've noticed no change in my speed, I just get the wierd shifting when I mouse over a post above another.  I use Windows 7 and I have IE8.  Just thought I'd mention it.

-Twi

@Zombie: I just tried bringing up the Karma popup.  It goes completely behind the main panel in my window.

I also am having issues with the karma window in firefox 6.01.

harpo

I don't think anyone is complaining as in demanding Bara get's it fixed right away, but to say don't bring it up here is stupid in my opinion.  Someone bringing it up let's others know about a problem.  I didn't know it wasn't working for me until after I read it and tried.  Now I know I have a problem and am interested in a solution or work around.  Others have confirmed issues because of the original comment about it, and you've provided reasons for it happening.  None of which would have happened if someone didn't 'complain' about it here.

Not to nitpick, but I only run one browser.  Pale moon.  I'm not downloading opera or chrome or bothering to go through the slew of updates to bring IE up to speed just to test a little forum issue to see if it's cross platform or just mine.  Nor would I expect or demand anyone else maintain 4 web browsers just to check to see if an issue affects one or two or all of them.  It can be done simply by coming onto the forum and saying, I have this browser and this is not working.  Basically complaining about it, and seeing who else has the problem.  If it's only those of us with firefox browsers or if someone running IE says theirs doesn't work either, or someone running opera... I get the same results , the same knowledge, without the trouble of doing all of the leg work.  Add in to that the very real possibility that someone has already found a solution to it, but assumes they were the only one with the issue and won't volunteer the info just because.  Also the possibility that Bara or someone else may not know the problem even exists because no one has said anything, but does know a way to work around it to implement server side rather then making all of us deal with it client side and will do exactly that in the next update.  Also something to consider, it worked before.  Knowing that, I would tend to believe it's not necessarily the browser, but rather the way the forum works.

I'm just one of the masses who uses the browser I use, my complaint to them about something not working right here in this forum isn't worth the electricity used to transmit said complaint.  Not unless I rally the troops and get a few thousand support tickets filed.

At any rate, the best place to complain about a forum issue is at the forum where the issue is happening, and no one should ever be told to not complain.  Bitching and whining about something, absolutely, I've got your back on that one, that person just needs to chill the hell out and settle down, but a simple complaint...  Come on...

Quoting harpo99999,

reply 47

specialised browsers having between 15 and fifty tabs each

 

Quoting harpo99999,

reply 47

 interterd exploder   

 

Wow, that's a lot of tabs, anyway, it's the forum, Chrome and Safari show the same problem. Personally, I use either Chrome and Safari, however, the last update for Safari has a weird add on that was not there before, it comes up webkit2webprocess.exe something another and uses the hell of my 2 gig memory on my netbook. So I've been using Chrome exclusively...

@ Stant

Heard of Pale moon, any good.

@ Harpo

Dragon browser.

Pale moon is firefox without the cross OS stuff built in so that it's optimized to run with windows much better.  Also has had a 64bit version out for a long time.