This post is for debate on what people feel the role of a general should be. Many people have suggested that a general should manage units from within the base like a traditional general and all his power should be throuh his tactics and use of his units. Others have said that they want a general to lead their troops into battle and be a centerpeice around which their private army can fight. Or is it a mix of the two.
There is already a suitable thread for General Discussion, all the ideas expressed by the forum users are already mentioned there. Unless you are intending of manually sorting through that thread and quoting all the relevent points into here.
Don't post here then I have read the entire generals thread but it is now 6 pages long. Am I the only one that thinks that is a little hard for people to get involved if the don't want to read for an hour to understand what is being talked about. This is just an option to continue the conversation instead of oscilatting between many ideas to the point where no one knows what is being talked about anymore.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Sign in or Create Account
Thank you! Please check your email for a confirmation link. Once confirmed, you can look forward to receiving exclusive specials and announcements direct from Stardock.
Need to unsubscribe?
