In the latest update the sensors were corrected to more sensible values, however there are some cost progression anomalies.
The current overview:
| |
Stats |
|
Deltas |
| |
Build Cost |
Mass |
Range |
Maintenance |
Immune to Nebula |
|
BC/mass |
BC/Range |
Range/Mass |
MC/Mass |
MC/Range |
| Navigational Sensors |
13,00 |
8,00 |
1,00 |
0,25 |
0,00 |
|
1,63 |
13,00 |
0,13 |
0,03 |
0,25 |
| Intersteller Sensors |
23,00 |
9,00 |
2,00 |
0,25 |
0,00 |
|
2,56 |
11,50 |
0,22 |
0,03 |
0,13 |
| Sensor Array |
41,00 |
10,00 |
3,00 |
0,50 |
0,00 |
|
4,10 |
13,67 |
0,30 |
0,05 |
0,17 |
| Field Detectors |
71,00 |
12,00 |
4,00 |
0,75 |
0,00 |
|
5,92 |
17,75 |
0,33 |
0,06 |
0,19 |
| Subspace Sensor |
123,00 |
14,00 |
5,00 |
1,25 |
1,00 |
|
8,79 |
24,60 |
0,36 |
0,09 |
0,25 |
But there is an easy fix:
| |
Stats |
|
Deltas |
| |
Build Cost |
Mass |
Range |
Maintenance |
Immune to Nebula |
|
BC/mass |
BC/Range |
Range/Mass |
MC/Mass |
MC/Range |
| Navigational Sensors |
13,00 |
8,00 |
1,00 |
0,10 |
0,00 |
|
1,63 |
13,00 |
0,13 |
0,01 |
0,10 |
| Intersteller Sensors |
27,00 |
9,00 |
2,00 |
0,25 |
0,00 |
|
3,00 |
13,50 |
0,22 |
0,03 |
0,13 |
| Sensor Array |
41,00 |
10,00 |
3,00 |
0,50 |
0,00 |
|
4,10 |
13,67 |
0,30 |
0,05 |
0,17 |
| Field Detectors |
71,00 |
12,00 |
4,00 |
0,75 |
0,00 |
|
5,92 |
17,75 |
0,33 |
0,06 |
0,19 |
| Subspace Sensor |
123,00 |
14,00 |
5,00 |
1,25 |
1,00 |
|
8,79 |
24,60 |
0,36 |
0,09 |
0,25 |
Fix in the xml
For the NavigationalSensors change the Value for Maintenance from 0.25 to 0.1
<Stats>
<EffectType>Maintenance</EffectType>
<Target>
<TargetType>Ship</TargetType>
</Target>
<BonusType>Flat</BonusType>
<Value>0.1</Value>
</Stats>
For the InterstellerSensors change the Value for SensorRangeManufacturingCost from 23 to 27:
<Stats>
<EffectType>SensorRangeManufacturingCost</EffectType>
<Scope>Queue</Scope>
<Target>
<TargetType>Ship</TargetType>
</Target>
<BonusType>Flat</BonusType>
<Value>27</Value>
