Yeah valid point but did you get a 0-5 kill ratio? Or even a 0-10 kill ratio?

The thread creator didn't meaned that you should quit every match thats imbalanced he just told about a "rule" when its obvious that you play an heavily imbalaned game. Thats far away from ragequiting, and ragequiting is what you described.

No it was 0-5.  But we were on the bad side of the ratio.  Probably in the 3-5 ratio.  Of course the rage-quitter had some of those deaths himself.  He was playing QoT and I was a tower rook (admittedly not very good at it---still learning how to do it right).  Some of the QoT deaths were b/c he was in a fight across the map from me and of course when he died he blamed me for not marching....my.....slow.....rook.....across.....the.....map.....to....help.

I win a lot of games that i die more then the opposition

Yeah this post is dumb, that's all I can say. Do what you want but now you are on my ban list. Thanks for the warning. Learn to play.

quit then. It will show up on your stats when you enter lobbies and you will find yourself getting booted.

Have fun.

You really can tell if you are going to lose the game.  

There are some ways you know you are still ok.. for example:

You have invested in gold upgrade (you therefore cannot afford armor for the time being) and therefore you get killed more often.  However, you keep the gold flag captured and you are now making more money than the opposing team.  

You will get better armor later and might be able to come back.  Your warscore is also higher.  However, if the enemy stuns you once, then second demi stuns you as you are coming out from first stun, and you get bite, spit and bat.. and you die (without the ability to run) you know you really can't do much at that point.  Everytime you go out of your citadel, you will just die.

I think he meant that you were either playing an OP spitting UB, OP biting Erebus, OP sniping Regulus, OP shielding Oak, OP tower spamming Rook or perhaps even an OP shield spamming QoT...

Play with my friends? I do. We used to stack teams, then it got boring. Randoms also won't want to play with you if you are a known premade, so we stopped doing it. It's not much fun for our opponents, who generally ragequit, and it's not challenging for us.

If we play on opposite teams on the other hand the game is more likely to be even, and more fun for everyone playing. I am suggesting other premades do this, or advertise their being a premade if they are going to stack teams.

Personally I really don't care if you stack teams and make a lobby, I'll join, lose quickly, then make a note of your team and not play against you again. Others ragequit and are being berated for it, which I don't think is entirely fair since you're not being open about stacking the teams.

So my point is that you're probably damaging the community by doing this? If it gets to the point where people can't play PUGs because it's dominated by premades the game will be in a pretty poor state imo. That would be removing a giant chunk of the playerbase.

EDIT:

My problem isn't that premades want to play as a team, I think by all means they should, and if they advertised themselves as such I'd grab my friends and play against them. It would probably be a really fun game. The issue is that if I make a 3v3 lobby, my housemate joins the other team to keep things fair, and then 2 friends on voice comm join one of the teams and 2 randoms join the other, things are never going to be even remotely close.