I beg to differ.  My last game was a 1-7 against us and we still won by capping portal flags.  My quit limit is 0-11. That when I pretty much know we are done.

Man I hate losing but honestly that's when I learn the most

uh... thats not very forgiving. comebacks can happen. i was expecting you to say if a SINGLE PLAYER goes 5 deaths in a row without contributing anything then you'll quit. i would too. can't stand playing while handicapped by a feeder. however, i've been in plenty of games where my team takes a few early deaths than gets a bit smarter and pulls it out in the end. 

Step 1:  Get in a clan

Step 2: ?????

Step 3: You win

Get friends or don't bitch fool.

Uh rolling pugs is for scrubs. Anyone can do that.

0-5 is a bit low.

And most people prefer to play in a game that isnt over before it has started. I stopped insisting on being on the same team as my friends once I realised it was going to seriously skill stack the teams and make the game boring for everyone.

If you want to be a smartass about it, then fine. But what is being said is that people shouldnt go and play Demigod online without having their friends with them, because they're going to get stomped by a gang of 3 buddies and that is OK.

I disagree that this is OK, I don't play alone very often but when I do it would be nice to have a decent match up once in a while rather than getting rolled over by an organised team.

You want to scrim? Go organise one. Find a team to play against or play against your friends. Otherwise stop being such poor sports and even the damn teams up.

Then be a man and go down with the ship. Otherwise you are just a ragequitter.

Why? Ignoring any 0-5 rule, the game is over and theres no need to continue. You say "gg" and that is the end of the game, you have conceded. There is no surrender button, but if there were it would be invoked in this instance.

People playing Starcraft dont wait for their entire base to be destroyed, they say gg and leave, it is how you concede a game and it is not necessarily "ragequitting" or anything to be frowned upon.

Ragequitting is leaving before the game has been decided, ie. after getting killed once or twice.

EDIT: Squash beat me to it

Were you ahead on War Score?

I can see your point, but it's pretty apparent when your team is going to lose. If you are a lower level, have no kills, many deaths, are significantly behind on war score, your enemy has several thousand more HP than you and never seems to run out of mana ... you are going to lose. There is no need to continue the game, it is settled. This isnt ragequitting.

I have won games where I have lost on every one of those measures EXCEPT War Score.

I played a 3v3 on Crucible where one of our allies disconnected very early so it was 2Players+1AI vs 2 Players.

My remaining ally swore about how I sucked for 15 minutes even though we were winning and had them bottled up near their citadel.  They had a money advantage but we owned the map and we had a warscore advantage and they couldn't go spend any of their money on artifacts since they could not get to the flag to cap it.

When the other team made a good push to recover territory my teammate swore again about how I sucked then ragequit even though the game was far from over and we still had the advantage.  After he left I was able to push the other team back and even get a few hits on their citadel but eventually lost b/c the AI was not able to effectively help with the push and keep them bottled up and they eventually got to the artifact shop and it was all over after that.

If my ally had not abandoned ship at the first sign of difficulty we might have pushed all the way to victory.