I agree. I'm a woman, so how they think that I even care about penis size is a wonder to me. When you add them to the spam list, they just invent another email address and keep going and going.

*not confident in their size.

Maybe they had a look at their own penises, the spammers. And because of that concluded that all other men had small penises as well...

Considering that I don't have a penis.......

It's just amazing the stuff that they send out. The scary thing is- they must actually have *somebody* who responds, or they wouldn't keep emailing.....

Indeed, apparently I need to increase my breast size too.

I heard on the radio that there was a drawing or something for a free penis enlargement online, and i guess over 3000 people registered within a matter of an hour! so maybe there is a big market.

The reason why it's worth it is because these company sell these useless products for like $50-100/bottle. The distributors cost for these miracle cures is something like $3-5/bottle. So, they tell spammers that they'll give them $25-50 per referral. So, if these spammers send out 100,000 e-mail and like 1,000 (or 1%) responds, that dude has made $25,000-50,000 for just sitting at their computer and clicking.

I get a lot of that spam and of hot girls that want to date me. I don't have a penis and I'm not a lesbian so they are barking up the wrong tree

I wonder if a "do not e-mail list" similar to the "do not call list" would help reduce spam?

Well, Tech Cat, the current anti-spam legislation that's passed congress gives the FCC the authority to implement a "Do Not Email" registry much like the national do not call list.

Unfortunately, it's a complete disaster in every other aspect of it - giving /way/ too many concessions to the marketers (such as making it impossible for anybody to actually -sue- a company.)

I'm pretty sore about this new law though - it also manages to give a direct slap in the face to each state, again, to the delight of marketers. It -specifically- takes away any state's right to pass or enforce their own anti-spam laws - so the new anti-spam law passed in California that a lot of people seem to like? It will be null and void if the new federal law goes into effect, and it (the federal one,) is a law with no teeth.

Nice bipartisan show of support for taking away states' rights!

Good one Draginol!

and i thought 80-100 spams per day was a lot...