Search
New Topic
Forum Home | Login
Isdahl
Isdahl
Join Date 02/2006
0

Planet Bombardment

Need some info

March 3, 2006 3:29:04 PM from GalCiv II ForumsGalCiv II Forums
I have some questions on planet bombardment with my fleets. I know i have to research the tech first, but are there any other limitations or requirements? Like is it limited to ship hull size, wpn type, number of ships? I have this planet i've been attacking and would like to soften up their defenses and 14,000 troops so my 3,500 troops can take the planet. I have 6 Frigates in orbit (med hull), but they only seem to attack the planet (when i target the planet with the FF fleets), when there is a enemy ship in orbital defense, and i have researched planetary bombardment a while ago. Am i missing something or is there something i dont know about?
Locked Post
Search this post
Advanced Search
Subscription Options
Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Isdahl
Steelviper
Join Date 02/2006
0
Reply #1 March 3, 2006 3:47:55 PM
from GalCiv II ForumsGalCiv II Forums
I haven't used this tech in-game, but I THINK this may be related to the planetary invasion tactic of "Mass Drivers". So you don't actually have to HAVE mass drivers, but when you go to actually invade you can select it as your tactic. It causes much devastation but has the potential to greatly increase your "advantage factor". There's info about this invasion tactic on the Galciv 2 wiki:
Link

Somebody please pipe in if this isn't correct.
Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Isdahl
Justas5
Join Date 02/2006
0
Reply #2 March 3, 2006 4:03:45 PM
from GalCiv II ForumsGalCiv II Forums
You cant attack a planet with ships. Planet Bombardment gives you the options of what attack to chose when landing your troops, for example MassDrivers, Core Detonation, Information Warfare and such.
Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Isdahl
exterous
Join Date 05/2003
0
Reply #3 March 3, 2006 4:09:08 PM
from GalCiv II ForumsGalCiv II Forums
Also, advance troop modules will allow you to carry more troops
Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Isdahl
Safari Joe
Join Date 02/2006
0
Reply #4 March 3, 2006 4:26:19 PM
from GalCiv II ForumsGalCiv II Forums
Planetary bombardment also improves soldiering (by +5 I think) so even if you don't choose the mass frivers option you still get some benefit from the tech. The mass driver option unlocked by planetary bombardment is probably the most ruthless of the options it can more then double your advantage factor but halves the planet quality, good late game invasion tactic.
Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Isdahl
Fan Fan
Join Date 02/2006
0
Reply #5 March 3, 2006 4:49:47 PM
from GalCiv II ForumsGalCiv II Forums
actually, i think bombardment only reduces planet quality if you lose, so you acn use a small number of troops to really reduce their numbers with mass drivers, and then dropping the real troops to take it over by traditional warfare.
Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Isdahl
Fan Fan
Join Date 02/2006
0
Reply #6 March 3, 2006 4:49:51 PM
from GalCiv II ForumsGalCiv II Forums
actually, i think bombardment only reduces planet quality if you win, so you acn use a small number of troops to really reduce their numbers with mass drivers, and then dropping the real troops to take it over by traditional warfare.
Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Isdahl
Isdahl
Join Date 02/2006
0
Reply #7 March 3, 2006 10:12:31 PM
from GalCiv II ForumsGalCiv II Forums
ok thnx guys, i agree, i ended up using the mass driver option and dropped more troops, and during the battle scene i notice the enemy was dropping like flys, even though i was out numbered 3 to 1, ofcourse the planet was a mess afterwards, but all is well the planet is under our control and producing CA's like mad. thanx for al the imput
Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Stardock Forums v        Server Load Time:   Page Render Time: